CAMPAIGN
FOR THE ACCESS TO ASYLUM
Athens, 31 January 2017
PRESS RELEASE
No more dead
refugees – Immediate transportation of the asylum seekers from the Aegean
islands to the mainland for a fair examination of the merits of their asylum
applications in a context of freedom and decent living conditions
Our organizations
participating in the Campaign for the Access to Asylum, have already expressed
since the very beginning of 2016 our deepest concern in relation to the
adoption by the European Union and the Greek Government of asylum policies
which constitute an unprecedented retreat from the European acquis in the field
of refugee protection. This view has been expressed and documented in our
previous public statements as well as in our press conference held on the 31st
of March 2016 in reference to the EU-Turkey Statement and its repercussions.
Today, nine months
later, reality reaffirms our previously
expressed fears and the Joint Statement proves to be disastrous for the
management of the refugee issue, given that its implementation has led to the
stranding of thousands of refugees on the islands of the north east Aegean Sea,
who are forced to live under unacceptable conditions. This is tragically
evidenced by the death of four asylum seekers.
Α. Concerning
the situation on the islands, the Campaign for the Access to Asylum would
like to point out the following:
·
There are more than 16.000 refugees stranded on the islands of the north
east Aegean Sea, living in overcrowded Reception and Identification Centers,
their number exceeding by far the capacity of those centers and all other
available accommodation places.
·
Detention up to 25 days is imposed to all new comers, including vulnerable
groups, without any individualized evaluation.
·
A mandatory restriction to stay at the islands is imposed to all asylum
seekers falling within the scope of application of the EU-Turkey Statement notwithstanding
the fact that the reception conditions are completely incompatible with the
relevant legal framework and not even the minimum safety standards are being
observed.
·
The reception procedures are problematic given that there are:
-
significant insufficiencies in the identification and protection for
vulnerable cases
-
serious delays in the registration and examination of the asylum
applications
-
violation of the principle of non-discrimination by the prioritization of the
registration and processing of the applications of persons of specific
nationalities
-
rejection of the largest majority of the asylum applications by Syrian
nationals as inadmissible on the grounds of the implementation of the “safe
third country” concept for Turkey, without due regard to the latest
developments in the country and the abundance of evidence that it does not meet
the legal requirements for being considered as such
-
competence and accountability issues because of the involvement of EASO
personnel in the examination procedure of the asylum requests.
·
Among the persons that have been returned to Turkey under the Joint
Statement framework there have been documented cases of people that had previously
requested international protection and were removed in violation of
international law.
·
Because of the unacceptable reception conditions, the persons stranded on
the islands attempt to abandon the islands and come to the mainland, which in
turn results to the deterioration of their actual and legal situation due to
the legal gap that is created concerning their residence status in the country.
B. Concerning the
situation in the mainland, the the Campaign for the Access to Asylum highlights the following:
·
According to the Greek authorities, there are still approximately 47.000
refugees staying in the country, a big number of whom lives in unacceptable
conditions, sometimes reaching the threshold of inhuman and degrading
treatment.
·
The entrance and stranding in the country of such a big number of people in
need of international protection has illustrated anew the systemic problems of
the Greek administration in relation to the reception and access to a fair and
effective system of international protection. We would specifically like to
stress:
-
the significant delay in the processing of the registration and examination
of the asylum applications as well as of the processing of the relocation and
family reunification cases, which aggravates the agony and the stand-by feeling
of the asylum seekers
-
the difficulties caused by the obligatory skype access to the asylum
procedure, which excludes a big part of the applicants from the asylum system
due to the unavailability of appropriate means, as well as by the limited access
due to the small number of available staff
-
the problematic examination of the applications at second instance,
especially after the formation of the Independent Appeal Committees (under the amended
provisions of the Law 4375/2016) and the subsequent extended participation of judges
at these committees, taking into account that the legality of the formation of
these committees is being challenged in front of the Greek administrative
courts.
C. In addition, the aforementioned
policies have:
·
Intensified the tensions and created incidents of intolerance to the local
communities, which were until recently standing in solidarity with the
refugees, exposing them to the influence of the racist rhetoric and its
followers, for which we are expressing our concern.
At this point we would
also like to express our concern for the similarly alarming inaction of the
competent authorities concerning incidents of violence against refugees like
the ones that took place at the camp of the Souda region of Chios.
·
Moreover, as a result of these policies the smuggling mechanisms have
strengthened at the expense of refugees and in favor of those taking advantage
of them.
D. Faced with the already illustrated
dead-end situation not only do the European institutions and the Greek
Ministry of Migration not show any intention of changing the policies connected
to the EU-Turkey Statement, but, on the contrary, they announced the
continuance and extension of those policies. In particular:
·
The Greek authorities are already preparing to transfer the asylum seekers
whose applications are still pending to closed centers, which practically means
detention centers.
·
The European and the Greek authorities are planning to extend the
implementation of the readmission procedure to Turkey to the only categories of
asylum seekers so far excluded, in particular to vulnerable cases and to family
reunification applicants under the Dublin III Regulation.
·
The European Commission is planning the resumption of asylum seekers’
returns back to Greece under the Dublin III Regulation, which has continuously
been criticized and condemned for the deadlock, unfair and inhuman situations
it produces, and without regard and against the findings of the Council of
Europe Committee of Ministers (which is the competent authority for the
evaluation of the general measures adopted by the Greek government concerning its
compliance to the M.S.S. v Belgium and
Greece judgement of the 21st January
2011 of the European Court of Human Rights) that Greece hasn’t cured the
violations of the legislation for which it was convicted by the European Court
of Human Rights with the aforementioned judgements among others.[1]
Ε. Recommendations
Our
organizations participating to the Campaign for the Access to Asylum believe
that in order that the above problems can be tackled, a completely different
policy should be adopted. More specifically:
At the EU level there is a need to
abolish the Dublin III Regulation and create a permanent relocation mechanism,
binding for all member states, on the basis of a fair distribution and
responsibility sharing, aiming at the protection of refugees.
At the national level there is a need for
the implementation of a fair and effective reception system which will on one
hand respect the rights of asylum seekers as those are depicted in national, EU
and international law, and on the other hand have the capacity to manage in due
time registration and examination of asylum applications, as well as processing
of family reunification and relocation cases.
More specifically:
1)
The following practices followed by the authorities should be immediately abandoned:
·
blanket detention at Reception and
Identification Centers, without any individualized evaluation
·
admissibility assessment based on the
consideration of Turkey as first country of asylum or safe third country which
is overtly violating international law
·
mandatory restriction of stay at the islands
in conditions endangering asylum seekers and subjecting them to degrading treatment
·
prioritization of certain nationalities for
the needs of implementing the EU-Turkey statement
·
involvement of EASO staff in the asylum
process despite the fact that this is not in accordance with the Regulation of
this EU Agency.
2)
Asylum applications submitted in the islands should be examined in merits
at the mainland in a context of freedom and decent living conditions.
3)
Asylum applications submitted by persons who have left the islands and have
moved to the mainland should also be examined in merits at the mainland.
Moreover,
regarding the situation in the mainland we would like to stress that the
following steps should be taken:
·
Strenghtening of the Asylum Service so as to
ensure:
-
full access to the asylum procedure by showing up to the Regional Asylum
Offices
-
fair examination of asylum applications in due time
-
fast processing of family reunification and relocation cases
·
Provision of reception conditions which are
compatible with international law.
To this
end it is urgent that the authorities will soon absorb the available EU funding
which is not taken advantage of –in times of refugee and financial crisis- due
to delays in constituting and running the Responsible Authority.
Given that more delay in taking these steps will lead to even more disastrous results, we hope that the competent Greek and EU authorities will take our recommendations into serious consideration and we remain at their disposal for detailed discussion on them.
Given that more delay in taking these steps will lead to even more disastrous results, we hope that the competent Greek and EU authorities will take our recommendations into serious consideration and we remain at their disposal for detailed discussion on them.
THE ORGANIZATIONS (in alphabetical order):
Δίκτυο Κοινωνικής Υποστήριξης Προσφύγων & Μεταναστών http://migrant.diktio.org
Greek Helsinki Monitor https://greekhelsinki.wordpress.com
Greek Council for Refugees http://www.gcr.gr
Greek Forum of Refugees http://www.refugees.gr
KSPM-Ecumenical Refugee Program http://www.ecclesia.gr/greek/koinonia/kspm.html
PRAKSIS http://www.praksis.gr
Initiative for the Detainees' Rights http://www.tokeli.gr
ΑΙΤIΜA http://www.aitima.gr
ARSIS – Association for the Social Support of Youth http://arsis.gr Δίκτυο Κοινωνικής Υποστήριξης Προσφύγων & Μεταναστών http://migrant.diktio.org
Greek Helsinki Monitor https://greekhelsinki.wordpress.com
Greek Council for Refugees http://www.gcr.gr
Greek Forum of Refugees http://www.refugees.gr
KSPM-Ecumenical Refugee Program http://www.ecclesia.gr/greek/koinonia/kspm.html
PRAKSIS http://www.praksis.gr
Initiative for the Detainees' Rights http://www.tokeli.gr
[1] ECRE Comments on the European
Commission Recommendation relating to the reinstatement of Dublin transfers to
Greece – C(2016) 871 http://www.ecre.org/ecre-comments-on-the-commission-recommendation-relating-to-the-reinstatement-of-dublin-transfers-to-greece/
See also recent ECtHR decision prohibiting Hungary to
return asylum seekers to Greece under Dublin III Regulation: ECtHR, M.S. v. Hungary, Application No 64194/16; H.J. v. Hungary,
Application No
70984/16. See further Hungarian Helsinki Committee,
Update
on Dublin transfers,
14 December 2016, available at: https://goo.gl/R3Thn5;
Greek National Committee for Human Rights Statement in response to the
recommendation of the European Commission to reactivate the refugee return
mechanism under Dublin system (19.12.2016) available at http://www.nchr.gr/images/pdf/nea_epikairothta/Dublin_statement_gr.pdf.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου
Σημείωση: Μόνο ένα μέλος αυτού του ιστολογίου μπορεί να αναρτήσει σχόλιο.